Free Algebra
Tutorials!
Home
Exponents
Factoring Trinomials
Solving Equations Containing Rational Expressions
Parallel and Perpendicular Lines
Finding the x- and y-Intercepts of a Line
Solving Linear Inequalities in One Variable
Adding and Subtracting Fractions
Factoring Trinomials by Grouping
Solving Systems of Linear Inequalities
Multiplying and Dividing With Square Roots
Monomial Factors
Factoring Perfect Square Trinomials
Linear Equations in One Variable
Factoring Special Products
Parallel and Perpendicular Lines
Monomial Factors
Factoring Expressions
Factoring Polynomials
Adding and Subtracting Fractions
Factoring Polynomials
Solving Quadratic Equations by Factoring
Graphing Linear Equations in the Coordinate Plane
Fractions
Factoring a Polynomial Completely
Factoring a Difference or a Sum of Two Cubes
   
 

Monomial Factors

Examples with solutions

Example 1:

Remove all common monomial factors from the expression

3r 4s 3 + 6r 3s 4 – 105r 2s 5

solution:

The first term in this expression has factors of 3, r, and s. So, we need to check whether 3 is a common factor in all three terms, and whether there are common powers of r and s in all three terms.

3r 4s 3 + 6r 3s 4 – 105r 2s 5 3 is a factor of the first term, and upon inspection is found to be a factor of the remaining two terms as well. So, remove a factor of 3 from all three terms.
= 3(r 4s 3 + 2r 3s 4 – 35r 2s 5) Each term contains a factor of r 2. Remove it.
= 3r 2(r 2s 3 + 2rs 4 – 35s 5) Each term in the brackets now contains a factor of s 3. Remove it.
= 3r 2s 3(r 2 + 2rs – 35s 2) Since the first term in brackets contains only powers of r, but the third term contains no factor of r, there cannot be any further common monomial factors in the three terms of the expression in brackets. The required factorization of monomial factors is thus complete.

Thus, with all fo the common monomial factors identified, we can write the final result as:

3r 4s 3 + 6r 3s 4 – 105r 2s 5 = 3r 2s 3(r 2 + 2rs – 35s 2)

(Once you’ve read the next section in these notes, you’ll be able to see that the expression in brackets in the final answer of this last example can, in fact, be written as a product, though not monomial factors. So, this is a final answer only as far as the methods presented so far here concerned.)

 

Example 2:

Remove all common monomial factors from the expression

54x 3y 2z – 150xy 4z

solution:

Looking at the first term here, we see that in addition to a possible common numerical factor, need to check for common powers of x, y, and z in the two terms.

The hardest part of this example is in determining the common numerical factor in the two terms. However, writing the two numerical coefficients as products of prime factors (we described how do this in the note called “Prime Factors” in the section on numerical fractions), we get

54 = 2 × 3 × 3 × 3

and

150 = 2 × 3 × 5 × 5

Thus, both terms share a factor of 2 × 3 = 6. Proceeding as in previous examples, we now get:

54x 3y 2z – 150xy 4z

 

= 6(9x 3y 2z – 25xy 4z) removing the already identified common numerical factor of 6. Now we note that both terms share a factor of x 1 = x, so remove this factor.
= 6x(9x 2y 2z – 25y 4z) Next, there is a common factor of y 2 shared by the two terms, so remove it.
= 6xy 2(9x 2z – 25y 2z) Finally, both terms share a factor of z, so remove it.
= 6xy 2z(9x 2 – 25y 2)  

Thus, the final answer here is

54x 3y 2z – 150xy 4z = 6xy 2z(9x 2 – 25y 2)

Shortly, we’ll demonstrate that the bracketed expression in the answer given above in Example can be factored into the product of two binomials, so that the most factored form of the original expression is

54x 3y 2z – 150xy 4z = 6xy 2z(3x + 5y)(3x – 5y).

However, the identification of all common monomial factors is the necessary first step before more specialized types of factorization can be attempted.

All Right Reserved. Copyright 2005-2010